|
Post by mhbruin on Dec 27, 2023 8:44:12 GMT -8
If you can't find the book you want, you're probably shopping at the .......... Perhaps the Scariest Poll Result I Have Ever ReadWhy do so many evangelical Christians support former President Donald Trump despite his decades of documented ungodly behavior? An in-depth report from The Economist shows that it has a simple explanation: They believe that God personally appointed him to rule the United States. In fact, the report cites a survey conducted by Denison University political scientist Paul Djupe that around 30 percent of Americans believe Trump "was anointed by God to become president." The Economist traces the origins of this line of thinking to Lance Wallnau, a self-declared prophet who has long been seen as a fringe figure but who gathered a following arguing that Trump was God's personal pick for the White House. In fact, Wallnau believes that God will use Trump to crush opposition to Christian nationalism and restore Christians as the nation's rightful political rulers. Many Trump supporters believe God has chosen him to rule
|
|
|
Post by mhbruin on Dec 27, 2023 8:47:26 GMT -8
I Wonder if They Will Use ChatGPT to Write the Defense Briefs
New York Times sues Microsoft and OpenAI for ‘billions’
The lawsuit, which also names Microsoft as a defendant, says the firms should be held responsible for "billions of dollars" in damages.
ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs) "learn" by analysing a massive amount of data often sourced online.
The BBC has approached OpenAI and Microsoft for comment.
The lawsuit claims "millions" of articles published by the New York Times were used without its permission to make ChatGPT smarter, and claims the tool is now competing with the newspaper as a trustworthy information source.
It alleges that when asked about current events, ChatGPT will sometimes generate "verbatim excerpts" from New York Times articles, which cannot be accessed without paying for a subscription.
According to the lawsuit, this means readers can get New York Times content without paying for it - meaning it is losing out on subscription revenue as well as advertising clicks from people visiting the website.
It also gave the example of the Bing search engine - which has some features powered by ChatGPT - producing results taken from a New York Times-owned website, without linking to the article or including referral links it uses to generate income.
Microsoft has invested more than $10 billion (£7.8 billion) in OpenAI.
|
|
|
Post by mhbruin on Dec 27, 2023 8:52:49 GMT -8
What Do William Wordsworth, Geoffrey Chaucer, Linguistics, and Taylor Swift Have in Common?As Taylor Swift became increasingly synonymous with American pop culture, universities around the country have started creating entire courses dedicated to studying her lyricism and impact. New York University’s Clive Davis Institute was among the first to offer such a class in 2022, with lectures taught by Rolling Stone’s Brittany Spanos. Others have followed suit in the semesters since. Some courses focus on Swift as a business and marketing mastermind, while others analyze her storytelling techniques with all the detail and skill of poetry analysis. Professors teaching Swift-inspired classes at Harvard University, the University of Texas at Austin, the University of Florida and the University of California, Berkeley unpacked their motivations for building entire courses around the 12-time Grammy winner and her discography. They shared the learning objectives of their courses and how students can get an A in “Taylor Swift Studies.” The art of studying Taylor Swift: College campuses embrace themed courses
|
|
|
Post by mhbruin on Dec 27, 2023 8:56:08 GMT -8
The OOP is Not Healthy for Children and Other Living ThingsRepublicans, particularly elected Republicans, pretend to care about many things. They pretend to care about the border. They pretend to care about crime. They pretend to care about “woke” teachers and professors in our public schools and universities, and they pretend to care about the type of books read by students who attend those schools and universities. They pretend to care about gender-affirming care for children they’ll never encounter, and they pretend to care about forcibly maintaining the unwanted pregnancies of people they have no interest in or respect for. Republicans spend so much time and effort pretending to care about these things because they want to distract Americans from what it is they really don’t give a damn about. Namely, they care not about the actual health, well-being, and survival of the ordinary people they’re paid to represent, especially those who happen to be from poorer or low-income families—children in particular. But most of all, Republicans want to distract us to avoid the fact that Democrats actually do care about such things. Beginning at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, states were prohibited, thanks to a law introduced by Democrats, from unenrolling Medicaid recipients—through regular eligibility based on family size and income—if they wanted to keep their funding. The process was called “continuous enrollment,” and according to KFF, it kept approximately 23 million Americans added to the Medicaid/Children’s Health Insurance Program rolls during that time of unprecedented economic crisis. Nearly one-third of those people were children. As of December 2022, the total Medicaid/CHIP enrollment numbers had grown to approximately 92 million. By law, the period of continuous enrollment ended on March 31, and the Medicaid unwinding, as it’s called, began. States began to quickly “unwind” their Medicaid/CHIP rolls, a process that resulted in cutting millions of people off from the health coverage they’d relied on during the pandemic. According to a study by KFF, about 70% of those cut off since March were removed due to “procedural” reasons, such as failing to return paperwork to confirm their eligibility—often because they had moved. Some states performed their unwinding process with what can most charitably be described as callous indifference. In Texas alone, as reported by the Texas Tribune, approximately 600,000 Medicaid/CHIP recipients were cut off from coverage. This severance happened not because their income had increased so much to render them ineligible, not because their children had aged out of the program, but because of “procedural” errors, including “everything from sending in applications in the mail a day late to not including the correct documentation.” What 750,000 Americans signing up for ACA coverage in a single day really says about our politics
|
|
|
Post by mhbruin on Dec 27, 2023 9:03:39 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by mhbruin on Dec 27, 2023 9:05:18 GMT -8
Allowing a Canddate on the Primary Ballot Without Ruling on Whether They Could Be on the General Election Ballot is a Disservice to the Party and Voters.
The Michigan Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected an effort to remove former President Donald Trump from the state’s primary ballot in 2024.
The court’s order blocks efforts to remove Trump from the 2024 ballot under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which states no one who has “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” after having sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution can hold office.
In a brief order issued Wednesday, the court said it declined to hear a case arguing that Trump should be left off of the state's ballot because it is “not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this court.”
The order comes after the Michigan Court of Appeals this month similarly rejected challenges to Trump's spot on the state's primary ballot. In a 3-0 opinion that cited Michigan law, the appellate court said: “Who to place on the primary ballot is determined by the political parties and the individual candidates.”
Courts in Arizona and Minnesota have also ruled against similar efforts to get Trump kicked off the ballot. The Minnesota Supreme Court last month dismissed a petition by a group of voters to ban Trump from the 2024 GOP primary and general election ballots, saying Minnesota law did not bar major parties from putting even ineligible candidates on the primary ballot.
|
|