|
Post by mhbruin on Sept 12, 2022 7:36:02 GMT -8
Driving distracted could have grim reaper cussions. Ukraine - The Big Picture - The Russians Are Leaving! The Russians Are Leaving!A Ukrainian counter-attack has forced Russian troops into a rapid retreat in the Kharkiv region. Here are the latest developments: -Ukraine says it has retaken more than 3,000 sq km (1,158 sq miles) from Russian forces around Kharkiv -The towns of Izyum and Kupiansk, both key hubs for the supply of Russian forces in Donbas, were taken by Ukraine on Saturday -A Ukrainian counterattack in Kherson in the south continues -Russia still holds about a fifth of the country, but the Russian retreat is being seen by many analysts as a very significant Ukrainian success Ukrainian troops have inflicted a "major operational defeat" on Russian forces, according to the Institute for the Study of War (ISW). Russia confirmed it had withdrawn from the key towns of Izyum and Kupiansk on Saturday, saying that the retreat would allow its troops to "regroup". Both towns were major logistical hubs for Russian forces in Donbas. Russian troops had been trying to advance towards Kramatorsk and Slovyansk. Izyum in particular was one of the most fortified sections of the Russian front line. Ukraine said it had retaken more than 3,000 sq km (1,158 sq miles) from Russian forces. Reports suggest that Ukrainian forces are also attempting to retake Lyman near Severodonetsk. Ukraine says it has continued to attack Russian positions near Kherson, targeting Russian transportation and logistics facilities. Reports suggest Ukrainian troops have made gains at several locations on the Russian front line in recent weeks. They have also attacked bridges, ferries and pontoons, attempting to make Russian positions of the west side of the Dnieper River unsustainable, and thereby force a withdrawal. The ISW says Russian forces now face a "terrible dilemma". Lacking resources to fight effectively in the east, they need to decide whether to send troops back to the front line near Kharkiv from Kherson in the south. But they know that by doing so, they may compromise their positions near Kherson and risk defeat.
|
|
|
Post by mhbruin on Sept 12, 2022 7:42:46 GMT -8
Slavery on the Rise
Modern slavery is a growing challenge thanks to a mix of armed conflict, climate change and the global pandemic, a new UN report says.
International Labour Organisation (ILO) estimates suggest that 50 million people - or one out of every 150 people alive - are trapped in forced labour or forced marriages.
That is up nearly 10 million on its numbers from five years ago.
The ILO said the fact things were getting worse was "shocking". (Duh!) The UN's labour organisation is keen to stress that slavery is not confined to poor countries far away from the Western world - more than half of all forced labour happens in wealthier countries in the upper-middle or high-income bracket.
And it counts both forced labour and forced marriage as modern enslavement - both situations where the person cannot leave "because of threats, violence, deception, abuse of power or other forms of coercion".
"Entrapment in forced labour can last years, while in most cases forced marriage is a life sentence," the report says.
About 27.6 million people are in forced labour, including 3.3 million children. Of those children, more than half are in commercial sexual exploitation.
Another 22 million people are in forced marriages - more than two-thirds of them women - and many victims are under 15 when the marriage takes place.
|
|
|
Post by mhbruin on Sept 12, 2022 7:51:58 GMT -8
Must Be Ukraine on the BrainInterestingly, the advance in the east has been much faster than the Ukrainians' well-publicised offensive in the south towards the city of Kherson. Ukraine had telegraphed that offensive long before it got under way, while keeping quiet about its plans for the east. It all now appears to have been part of its plan: if not a diversion, then a screen to hide what it was preparing in the east. It's clear it successfully wrong-footed Russia. Over the past few months, Russia's been redeploying forces from the east to bolster its defences in the south. Both fronts are now vulnerable. But Ukraine is finding it harder to make gains in the south where they're more exposed, having to fight in mostly open countryside. An advancing army needs more troops and firepower to overcome a defending army. ................. What's Next?The militarily logical thing for Russia to do would be to fall back to Svatove, east of the administrative border with Kharkiv Oblast, and build defenses to protect that mass to its east. Yet Russia isn’t bothering to try. Ukraine General Staff reported last night that “In Luhansk region, the Russian military and their families left the town of Svatove. Only soldiers of the so-called 'people's militia' from among the local residents remained." With Russia abandoning them, will the Donbas cannon fodder decide to fight? Hopefully not. And with Svatove liberated, Ukraine can look east to the vast empty nothing of northern Luhansk Oblast. The town of Starobilsk (pop. 16,600) anchors the entire region’s transportation network—all the major roads cross through town, as well as the lone rail line east of Svatove. It’s wide, it’s open, it’s flat, with few settlements standing in the way. The Aidar River borders Starobilsk to the west, but that would be nothing more than a nuisance to Ukrainian forces, who could cross it with little interference to the north or south of the town. So if Svatove falls, so does northern Luhansk, and we’re almost back to the pre-February borders in that region. Ukraine could station a small territorial defense force garrison in Starobilsk, just for early-warning if Russia decides to cross that long border again, but the bulk of the force could head south and lay siege to Luhansk city, pressuring it from both the north and west. If Luhansk were liberated, western Luhansk would be effectively cut off. Pushing further south would threaten Donetsk city from multiple directions. As for Russian forces, reinforcements were seen heading toward Mariupol. Russia isn’t feeling too great about its “land bridge” to Crimea, and for good reason. Ukraine doesn’t want to just cut that land bridge, but wants its Azov Sea coastline back. Not only is it of upmost economic importance, but it would also threaten more of Russia’s Black Sea fleet as well as the Kerch Bridge connecting Crimea to the Russian mainland. By some estimates, Russia has around 40% of its total combat capabilities between Mariupol and Melitopol. Kherson city is actually strategically insignificant. Melitpol? Liberate it, and Russia loses supply lines to Kherson Oblast (a major reason Russia wanted its land bridge in the first place) and shatters Russia’s dreams of expanding to Transnistria in Moldova, through Odesa. Quite simply, taking Melitopol would cause that entire sector to collapse, the way we saw in Kharkiv, and would provide a staging area for the liberation of Crimea. A Clever Russian Delaying Tactic
|
|
|
Post by mhbruin on Sept 12, 2022 7:55:50 GMT -8
Meanwhile in Texas & Michigan
|
|
|
Post by mhbruin on Sept 12, 2022 7:59:06 GMT -8
The Russians are Desperate for a Win
What do Russian generals want? A win. Where do they want it? Bakhmut. And to get it, they are staging near continuous attacks in which artillery bounds Ukrainian positions while “zerg waves” of Russian infantry attempt to storm Ukrainian positions. The fighting may be the most intense of the entire invasion. So intense that at one point on Saturday, Russia reportedly agreed to a brief armistice in order to remove mounds of bodies along a slope leading up to Ukrainian positions.
Just remember, if Russia does take this location: it’s one small city. It won’t heal any of the damage that’s been done to the Russian military,
|
|
|
Post by mhbruin on Sept 12, 2022 8:00:24 GMT -8
Here Comes the Sun
French independent power producer HDF Energy expects its green hydrogen power plant in Namibia, Africa’s first, to start producing electricity by 2024, according to a senior company executive.
“Yearly we can produce 142 gigawatt hours, enough for 142,000 inhabitants and that is conservative,” Nicolas Lecomte, HDF Energy director for Southern Africa, said on Monday.
Once operational, the 3.1 billion Namibian dollars ($181.25m) Swakopmund project will supply clean electricity power, 24 hours a day all year round, boosting electricity supply in the Southern African nation.
Currently, Namibia imports more than a third of its power from neighbouring South Africa.
One of the world’s sunniest and least densely populated countries, it wants to harness its vast potential for solar and wind energy to produce green hydrogen and position the country as a renewable energy hub in Africa.
Hydrogen is categorised “green” when it is made with renewable power and is seen as key to help decarbonise industry, though the technology remains immature and relatively costly.
The project will see 85MW of solar panels powering electrolysers to produce hydrogen that can be stored.
|
|
|
Post by mhbruin on Sept 12, 2022 8:01:57 GMT -8
A Texas Judge Prefers a Pound of Cure
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. As an HIV doctor in central Texas, I know that nowhere is that adage truer than in the case of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a medication that is up to 99% effective at preventing HIV. A recent ruling in a Texas federal court has the potential to threaten not just PrEP but access to all commonsense preventive medical care for people in the U.S.
A recent ruling in a Texas federal court has the potential to threaten not just PrEP but access to all commonsense preventive medical care for people in the U.S.
On Wednesday, a U.S. district court judge ruled in favor of Braidwood Management Inc., a Christian-owned company that argued in its initial complaint that the Affordable Care Act’s requirement that insurers and employers offer plans that cover PrEP for free “forces religious employers to provide coverage for drugs that facilitate and encourage homosexual behavior, prostitution, sexual promiscuity, and intravenous drug use.”
This argument is not only terribly prejudiced, but it is also simply wrong. PrEP is used by hundreds of thousands of people in the U.S. of all sexual orientations and genders. I see many patients, young and old, gay and straight, of all races and political affiliations, who do not fit the narrow stereotypes mentioned in the lawsuit.
I have patients who are in long-term monogamous relationships and take PrEP because their spouse or partner has HIV and they want an extra layer of protection. Others take PrEP so that they are sure they are protected and have control over their health rather than relying on another person. Some have been assaulted in the past and want to ensure that they are protected in the future. All of these patients can now live their lives with more peace and confidence, and they would be devastated if access to this medication were taken away.
|
|
|
Post by mhbruin on Sept 12, 2022 8:04:30 GMT -8
How Can You Be Certain Something is Wrong? If TucKKKer Says It.
On Fox News, host Tucker Carlson wrote an oped opining that British monarchs ruled “with decency unmatched by any empire in human history.” Commentators “attacking” the queen and her “benign” monarchy, Carlson wrote, are doing so “because she lived during a better time.”
This, perhaps unsurprisingly, is a profoundly ignorant reading of history. One can appreciate British advancements in government, policy and free speech without whitewashing centuries of history. Indeed, if we are to truly understand the significance and impact of the queen’s death, we cannot just focus on the outpouring of grief from the British Isles. We must consider the true impact on the former empire.
Britain found its place in the world through its empire, which was the largest that has ever existed, encompassing a quarter of the world at its peak. Britain likes to pretend that it was honest hard work and scientific genius that made the nation “great.” But in reality, it was genocide, slavery and colonialism that propelled a small island nation into a global leader. Let’s not forget that Queen Elizabeth I launched Britain’s involvement in transatlantic slavery, and the Royal African Company was responsible for enslaving more Africans than any other company in the world. In order to abolish slavery, the British government paid 40% of its 1833 budget to compensate slave owners for their losses. It is estimated that as much as a fifth of wealthy Britons at the time received a payout.
The monarchy may have existed before the empire, but its wealth and status cannot be separated from Britain’s colonial plunder. The proof is not subtle — on formal occasions, the royal family displays their sparkling loot openly. During the heyday of the empire, the monarch represented the subjugation of the colonies, the incarnation of Britannia ruling the waves. The second longest serving monarch, Queen Victoria, reveled in her title of “Empress of India.” Queen Elizabeth’s empire was already mostly dismantled, but she remained a symbolic connection to the glories of the past. The perfect symbol of colonial nostalgia, of when Britain had its rightful place in the world. The reverence which greeted her on visits to the former colonies bolstered old school British (white) self-esteem. But the mood is changing in the former colonies.
|
|
|
Post by mhbruin on Sept 12, 2022 8:05:46 GMT -8
Is TucKKKer About To Come Out In Favor Or More Cancer?
President Joe Biden will announce new steps to expand on his administration's "Cancer Moonshot" initiative to prevent deaths from the disease in a speech Monday afternoon at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum in Boston.
In his remarks, which come on the 60th anniversary of Kennedy's speech on his goal of putting a man on the moon, Biden will announce he's naming longtime science adviser Renee Wegrzyn as the inaugural director of the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health, which he created in March. The agency's mission is to improve the federal government's ability to foster health and biomedical research.
"Under Dr. Wegrzyn’s leadership, ARPA-H will support programs and projects that undertake challenges ranging from the molecular to the societal, with the potential to transform entire areas of medicine and health in order to prevent, detect, and treat some of the most complex diseases such as Alzheimer’s, diabetes, and cancer, providing benefits for all Americans," the White House said.
Biden will also sign an executive order that aims to boost biotechnology and biomanufacturing to ensure that cutting-edge technologies like those needed to fight cancer will be developed and made in the U.S., the White House said.
|
|
|
Post by mhbruin on Sept 12, 2022 8:07:52 GMT -8
The QOP Is Like Charley Brown and the Football. Previous Guy is Lucy.
Former President Donald Trump is only concerned about one person: former President Donald Trump. So even though he’s bilking his MAGA groupies for millions, he’s failing to support his endorsed Republican Senate nominees—with just weeks until the midterm elections.
According to Politico, Mitch McConnell has been quietly pushing the twice-impeached ex-president to start digging into the coffers of his leadership PAC and super PACs—a necessary move if the GOP wants any chance of winning back the Senate.
Trump is sitting on nearly $99 million in his PAC, and although he vocally endorses a few candidates nationwide—J.D. Vance in Ohio and Blake Masters in Arizona—apparently, he has given them little more than scraps toward the financial support they desperately need.
Sen. Kevin Cramer, a Republican from North Dakota, tells Politico that Trump “should invest to win, and not just to finish second or tied. I think he ought to do it. I really do. I think he ought to get generous. One thing Donald Trump doesn’t like to do is lose.”
In a July op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, Karl Rove mused about what Trump was doing with his treasure trove of campaign donations, writing that the former president “hasn’t shown much interest” in giving to Republican candidates. “If Mr. Trump doesn’t start actually deploying these funds to help candidates he’s backed for Congress, governor, and other statewide offices, donors might not keep giving to the former president’s causes. Trump-endorsed candidates might start to wonder how strong an ally the former president really is, beyond lending his name in a primary,” Rove wrote before millions in donations poured into Trump’s war chest following the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago in mid-August.
A GOP strategist working on House and Senate races tells Politico that Trump’s “a penny pincher. He’s not going to spend money on people when he can spend money on himself. In lieu of spending money, he can do events for you. Everyone thought that, by Labor Day, he would be loosening up the purse strings a bit, and money would be flowing in.”
|
|
|
Post by mhbruin on Sept 12, 2022 8:11:06 GMT -8
Another Lazy QOP Senate Candidate
In his campaign for the U.S. Senate in North Carolina, Republican candidate Ted Budd has described himself as a "conservative warrior" and a "liberal agenda crusher." But some of his fellow Republicans worry he is not fighting hard enough.
While Democratic candidate Cheri Beasley has spent the summer running TV ads and campaigning across the state, Budd has kept a lower profile, staying off the airwaves for months and devoting much of his time to private fundraising events.
Former Governor Pat McCrory, who lost to Budd in a hard-fought Republican primary, told Reuters that Budd is running a "risk averse" campaign, while conservative radio host Brett Winterble lamented the lack of "fire and fury" in the race.
The North Carolina contest is one of a handful that could determine which party controls the Senate after the Nov. 8 midterm elections. Republicans need to pick up only one seat to win back the majority, which would enable them to block most of Democratic President Joe Biden's legislative agenda and reject his nominees for jobs in his administration and the federal judiciary.
Opinion polls show a race effectively tied between Budd, a congressman and gun-store owner backed by former President Donald Trump, and Beasley, a former chief justice of the state Supreme Court who would become the only Black woman in the Senate if elected.
Seven Republican strategists said in interviews that they are concerned that Budd is not doing enough to court independent voters, who now outnumber registered Republicans and Democrats in the politically competitive state.
The strategists said they fear the race will steal resources from Republican candidates in other states including Georgia and Arizona that are key to the party securing Senate control.
I'll Have a Senate Update Tomorrow
|
|