Post by mhbruin on Jan 23, 2022 12:30:37 GMT -8
Here are some teams that bracketologists have in the field. How does Stanford stack up?
Obviously the first thing you notice is the NET ranking for Stanford. At #93, it is by far the worst of this group.
But let's look at quality (Quad 1 and 2) wins. Stanford has 5. No one in this group has more, and only two other have that many.
Florida State has 5 quality wins, but they also have 2 bad losses. Stanford has none.
KenPom rates Stanford #90. Stanford has a nice body of work, but the computers hate the Cardinal.
Clearly it is early, but right now those computer numbers make them look like a long shot.
| NET | Quad 1 | Quad 2 | Quad 3 | Quad 4 | SOS | Best Win | Worst Loss | ||
| Stanford | 93 | 3-3 | 2-3 | 1-0 | 5-0 | USC | |||
| Creighton | 49 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 5-1 | 4-1 | ||||
| Wake Forest | 40 | 1-3 | 4-1 | 4-0 | 7-0 | ||||
| USF | 35 | 2-3 | 2-1 | 4-0 | 7-0 | ||||
| St. Mary's | 28 | 1-4 | 3-0 | 4-0 | 6-0 | ||||
| Oregon | 62 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 3-1 | 4-0 | ||||
| Florida | 34 | 1-4 | 3-1 | 2-0 | 6-1 | ||||
| Florida St. | 57 | 2-3 | 3-0 | 4-2 | 2-0 | ||||
| TCU | 43 | 2-2 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 6-0 | ||||
| Arkansas | 53 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 2-2 | 8-0 | ||||
| Texas A&M | 60 | 0-4 | 2-0 | 6-0 | 6-0 | ||||
Obviously the first thing you notice is the NET ranking for Stanford. At #93, it is by far the worst of this group.
But let's look at quality (Quad 1 and 2) wins. Stanford has 5. No one in this group has more, and only two other have that many.
Florida State has 5 quality wins, but they also have 2 bad losses. Stanford has none.
KenPom rates Stanford #90. Stanford has a nice body of work, but the computers hate the Cardinal.
Clearly it is early, but right now those computer numbers make them look like a long shot.